Brisbane Awakening Lex Magica Brisbane Proposed

Gold Law

The Precept of Secrecy

The Precept of Secrecy is held true, and has been held true since the founding of the First Consilium. It demands that the existence of the Mysteries be kept secret, such that sleepers will not learn of it nor unawakened supernaturals glean its secrets.

It is supported by precedent that casting vulgar magic before Sleeper witnesses carries with it the penalty of Major Reprimand regardless of whether those witnesses tell others, but that casting vulgar magic before recognized witnesses is permitted so long as it is not otherwise in violation of this Precept.
It is supported by precedent that revealing secrets of the Arcana to the unawakened, including other supernaturals, carries with it the penalty of Banishment. If the information was revealed unwittingly, or the mage(s) involved made an effort to clean up the leak deemed satisfactory by the Council, the punishment may be mitigated at the Council’s discretion.

The Precept of Recognition

The Precept of Recognition is held true, and has been held true since the founding of the First Consilium. It demands that any mage or cabal wishing to be protected by the Consilium must be formally recognized by the Consilium, and that any mage recognized by the Consilium is beholden to follow its laws and submit themselves to its judgements. It further deems that any formal declaration by the Consilium Council sets a precedent by which future judgements may be pronounced.

It is supported by precedent that the Gardens Point Assembly is recognized as an independent political entity by the Consilium along with all mages who openly affiliate with it and vice versa, with the provision that any mage who violates the laws of one may be extradited to it for judgement as the offended body sees fit.
It is supported by precedent that the unawakened supernaturals which inhabit Brisbane are recognized as under the aegis of the Brisbane Concord and that a ceasefire is in effect with them. Violation of this ceasefire is deemed to carry with it at least a penalty of Minor Penance, which may be made more severe at the discretion of the Council based on the nature of the violation.

The Precept of Protectorate

The Precept of Protectorate is held true, and has been held true since the founding of the First Consilium. It demands that all mages and cabals may, at their discretion, disclose to the Consilium the location of their sanctums and in return those sanctums will be held sacrosanct under this Precept. It further demands that any recognized mage or cabal is beholden to respect the sanctity of any sanctum so protected, and not do any unsanctioned harm to it.

It is supported by precedent that each recognized cabal is free to set its own stances on the Greater Protocols and so long as they are openly declared to the Consilium, appropriate markings are displayed in any legally claimed territory, and the exercise of those Greater Protocols does not violate the Lex Magica.
It is supported by precedent that approaching a recognized sanctum unannounced and in violation of an appropriately displayed Greater Protocol may be punished with a Minor Reprimand.
It is supported by precedent that testing the limits of a recognized sanctum, whether by means mundane or arcane, may be punished with a Minor Penance.
It is supported by precedent that entering a recognized sanctum without permission and/or in violation of a displayed Greater Protocol may be punished with Incarceration.

The Precept of Hubris

The Precept of Hubris is held true, and has been held true since the founding of the First Consilium. It demands that all mages recognized by the Consilium are beholden to follow a high standard of behaviour, such that they may be an example to the world.

It is supported by precedent that the use of the Mysteries to inflict temporary or insignificant harm, as judged by the Council on a case-by-case basis, upon another recognized mage without the sanction of the Lex Magica is punishable by no more than Payment of Debt providing that it does not also constitute a violation of another Precept.
It is supported by precedent that the use of the Mysteries to inflict lasting or severe harm, as judged by the Council on a case-by-case basis, upon another recognized mage without the sanction of the Lex Magica is punishable by no less than a Minor Penance providing that it does not also constitute a violation of another Precept.
It is supported by precedent that the use of the Mysteries to inflict temporary or insignificant harm, as judged by the Council on a case-by-case basis, upon a sleeper without the sanction of the Lex Magica is punishable by at least a Minor Penance and may be punished more severely depending upon whether it constitutes a violation of other Precepts.
It is supported by precedent that the use of the Mysteries to inflict lasting or severe harm, as judged by the Council on a case-by-case basis, upon a sleeper without the sanction of the Lex Magica is punishable by at least a Severe Reprimand and may be punished more severely depending upon whether it constitutes a violation of other Precepts.
It is supported by precedent that although the primary purpose of the Precept of Hubris is to govern the appropriate use of the Mysteries, it is still within the Council’s rights to pass judgement on mundane acts that they feel constitute unacceptable acts of hubris by the Awakened. This same precedent holds that any recognized mage is beholden to comply with the laws of sleepers where the Lex Magica does not say otherwise, and that any such violations may be punished by the Council either in addition to sleeper legal punishments or in lieu of them where the Council deems it necessary (such as the case of a mage using the Mysteries to commit an otherwise mundane crime).

The Precept of War

The Precept of War is held true, and has been held true since the First Consilium. It demands that any recognized mage may call for dispute resolution through the Duel Arcane, and that such a resolution may be sanctioned by the Council. It further demands that the use of magic for violence be limited, and requires that any mage who intends to utilize the Mysteries for such purposes against other recognized mages or sleepers must comply with the principles of Jus Ad Bellum ("right to war") and Jus In Bello ("laws of war").

It is supported by precedent that the Duel Arcane may be used to settle a disagreement between recognized mages and/or cabals. Precedent requires that both parties in the dispute be willing to participate in the Duel and abide by the result, as well as that the Council be willing to sanction the use of a Duel to resolve the dispute. Precedent supports the Council choosing the mage to Square the Circle to enforce that it is with their sanction that the Duel occurs and that it carries the weight of their judgement.
It is supported by precedent that Spiritual Warfare, the practice of taking violent magical conflict to the Shadow Realm, is expressly forbidden and doing so may be punished with as much as a Severe Reprimand.
It is supported by precedent that the Council will sanction arcane violence by recognized mages and/or cabals only if it is required to enforce the Lex Magica or otherwise protect the existence of the Consilium, and that any recognized mage or cabal which engages in magical violence without the Council’s sanction will be subject to judgement based on (but not limited to) the Precepts of Secrecy, Hubris, and Protectorate.
It is supported by precedent that violence which does not involve the use of the Mysteries still falls within its jurisdiction, but is considered less severe as it does not generally risk violating the Precept of Secrecy. It will, however, be judged based on whether it violates the Precepts of Protectorate and Hubris.

Silver Law

The Charter of the Second Consilium of Brisbane

It is recognized that the Charter of the Second Consilium of Brisbane is a formal declaration of intent and purpose for the Second Consilium of Brisbane. The content of said document is recognized as grounds for Bronze Law precedent and where relevant Iron Law considerations. It is also recognized that the document does not present a maximum limitation on the number of cabals whom it binds, that on any subject unmentioned by the document the Laws of the Lex Magica Brisbanensis take precedent, and that on any subject the document does discuss it considered only a precedent in the context of the Lex Magica Brisbanensis and not as a superseding document.

Protocols of Consilium

It is recognized that upholding the Lex Magica and providing guidance to the Awakened is a task for only the most enlightened of mages. Enlightenment entails numerous things for the Awakened; one must be learned in the Mysteries, possessed of great Wisdom, and able to navigate the great body of precedent and protocol that is the Lex Magica. Ensuring that only those fit for the task take up the mantle is one that requires codified order and procedure. Similarly, ensuring that the Consilium retains its Supernal Mandate and does not merely become an entity by which those who lack Wisdom wield power over their subordinates requires codified order and procedure. Thus it is recognized that a proper Consilium must maintain a proper Cursus Honorum; a course of offices that sets down procedures for appointing offices and precedents by which such appointments can be made.

There is a precedent that any office for which a mage receives recognition is, if they are not otherwise removed from it, relinquished upon death of the physical body. It is recognized that a ghost may not continue to hold any position; only a living mage may do so.

Liegemanship/Liegewomanship

It is recognized that any recognized mage who wishes to take up political office in the Consilium must first prove their worth. Any recognized mage may volunteer their services to the Consilium, and by so doing be recorded in Iron Law as having offered their services. Should the Consilium have need of services they may be called upon to fulfil their oath. Any mage may, having done so at least once, petition the Council to have their achievements formally recognized and entered into Bronze Law. If the Council does so, then the mage receives the title of Liegeman or Liegewoman as appropriate and is considered to have demonstrated their worthiness for office.

Post of Sentinel

It is recognized that all Consilium Councils have need of individuals who can go out and ensure that the Lex Magica is being followed. Thus historical precedent permits the appointment of worthy mages to the office of Sentinel. Any mage who has been recognized as being worthy of the title of Liegeman or Liegewoman may petition the Council for appointment to this office. Precedent requires that such a petition must be supported by evidence that the petitioner is able to handle dispute resolution in accordance with the Lex Magica. If the Hierarch believes the petitioner to be worthy of the office, and is not opposed by a majority of the Council, then the mage is recognized as possessing the office until such a time as they resign or are stripped of the title by the Hierarch.

Post of Herald

It is recognized that all Consilium Councils have need of individuals who can carry their judgements and messages to their constituents and neighbours. Thus historical precedent permits the appointment of worthy mages to the office of Herald. Any mage who has been recognized as worthy of the title of Liegeman or Liegewoman may petition the Council for appointment to this office. Precedent requires that such a petition must be supported by evidence that the petitioner possesses a reputation beyond reproach, as well as excellent skills as a communicator and diplomat. Any such petition must be sponsored by a Councillor and presented to the Hierarch, the latter of whom has the final say in making the appointment. If so appointed, then the mage is recognized as possessing the office until such time as they resign or are stripped of the position.

Post of Provost

It is recognized that the office of Councillor entails much responsibility and work, and that this load may be too large for one individual to manage practically. Thus historical precedent permits the appointment of worthy mages to the office of Provost. Any mage who has been recognized as worthy of the title of Liegeman or Liegewoman may be chosen to serve as a Provost; and each Councillor may freely appoint a single Provost to serve as their personal aide. Such appointments must be announced to the Council, and once they are and the mage is sworn in to their office the appointment is recognized. A mage retains the office of Provost until they resign or are stripped of the position.

Post of Councillor

It is recognized that at the heart of any and all Consilii sits the Consilium Council, who carry the mantle of being the arbiters and spiritual guides of all Awakened within the jurisdiction of their Consilium. It is recognized that, whilst not all Consilii follow the tradition, there is a strong historical and mystical precedent that the Supernal Realms should be reflected in the composition of the Council. Thus the Consilium Council of Brisbane is composed of five members, with one member belonging to each of the five Paths and holding a seat representative of their Watchtower. To be elected to this office represents demands great esteem on the part of the mage chosen, who must at least be a Liegeman or Liegewoman and ideally have been recognized as a past or incumbent holder of one of the lower offices. When there is need to fill one of the five Seats any recognized mage of the appropriate path may petition the Council for the office, presenting evidence of their worth by recalling precedents from Bronze and Iron Law. The incumbent Councillors are free to test the candidate as they please. If the majority of the Council agrees to the appointment, then the mage is recognized as a Councillor holding the Seat of their Watchtower. This office is held until the mage either resigns, or is indicted by the Council and judged unworthy of continued office.

It is recognized that the five Seats on the Consilium Council of Brisbane are known as: The Seat of the Golden Key, held by an Obrimos; The Seat of the Lunargent Thorn, held by an Acanthus; The Seat of the Lead Coin, held by a Moros; The Seat of the Iron Gauntlet, held by a Mastigos; and The Seat of the Stone Book, held by a Thyrsus.
It is recognized that an indictment requires special considerations due to the nature of the trial and the normal duties of Councillors. In the event that a Councillor is the accused in a trial, they automatically become their own advocate. They are additionally disbarred from participating in the judiciary process, with the vote being held by only three Councillors.

Post of Hierarch

It is recognized that even a Consilium Council requires a source of leadership and guidance, and that such an individual must be able to take on their duties with both strength and wisdom. Thus historical precedent recognizes the importance of the office of Hierarch, the foremost member of the Consilium Council. This office is of tremendous historical and mystical importance, demanding that its bearer be a mage who exemplifies the qualities of being wise, knowledgeable, and skilled in the Arcane arts as well as capable of leading the Consilium both in times of peace and of war. It is recognized that the office of Hierarch of Brisbane is an extension on the office of Councillor, and thus that it is not only permitted but necessary for the Hierarch to also hold one of the five Seats on the Consilium Council. When the Consilium Council finds itself without a Hierarch for whatever reason, it must elect a new one. This first requires that all five Seats be filled, and that all five Councillors be present in a meeting for this purpose. It is at this point that any of the Councillors may nominate themselves or another Councillor for the position, citing evidence and precedent as necessary to support the nomination. In the event that only a single nomination is made, no further discussion is required. If there are multiple nominations then the Council must discuss the matter until a single candidate remains, then the individual so nominated must inform all constituent cabals recognized by the Consilium. Any recognized mage may here present themselves before the Consilium Council and oppose this nomination provided that they do so within a month of the nomination being made, after which the Council is obliged to recognize the presentation and a judgement upon it. Lacking sufficient opposition to change the judgement of the Council within a month, the nominated Councillor will be recognized as Hierarch until such time as they resign or they are removed from office.

It is recognized that there may be situations in which the Council is unable to reduce the number of candidates it has for the office of Hierarch through discussion alone. In such a case that the Council is deadlocked on this decision, there is precedent for the deadlock to be broken through a Duel Arcane.
It is recognized that the power of this office, whilst necessary and supported by precedent, may allow for a corrupt official to win support despite their lack of the necessary qualities. There is a precedent that any mage may challenge the Hierarch to a Duel Arcane, with the condition that the Hierarch step down from office if they lose or else be recognized as defying the Lex Magica.
- As an adjunct to this, it is recognized that stepping down as Hierarch due to defeat in a Duel Arcane of this nature does not also require abdicating the Seat which the Hierarch holds as a Councillor unless also impeached by the Council.
It is recognized that any Councillor may call for a vote of no-confidence in the leadership of the Hierarch. If such a vote is called, then the Hierarch is obliged to hold an open meeting of the Consilium to discuss the matter followed by a vote. If the vote achieves at least a two-thirds majority then the Hierarch is obliged to resign from office.
- As an adjunct to this, it is recognized that preventing the formation of power vacuums that may destabilize the political structure of the Consilium is necessary. As such, any vote of no-confidence must be accompanied by a nomination for an alternative candidate for Hierarch who will take power if the vote is successful.

Protocols of Trial

It is recognized that if a matter brought before the Ruling Council is deemed worthy of judgement in accordance with the Lex Magica, either due to the vote of a majority of the Ruling Council or by decree of the Hierarch, the trial must follow the following procedures to be considered valid and in accordance with due process:

Before any formal procedures begin, the Ruling Council is required to wait at least twenty-four hours, during which time the Council is encouraged to discuss the nature of the trial. Any trial may be declared secret if the Hierarch wishes. During this time the plaintiff may petition for a Councillor to represent him or her. If the Councillor accepts this petition, they will be regarded as the plaintiff’s advocate for the purposes of the trial. At this point the plaintiff, accused, or advocate may request the attendance of a factotum from one of the Pentacle Orders to attend the trial.
1. Precedent permits that the Guardians of the Veil may petition for a trial to be held in secret and that the Hierarch is obliged to consider their petition. If the Hierarch rejects the petition, he or she is obligated to present a considered reason why which is entered into the Bronze Law of the Lex Magica.
2. If a Councillor accepts a petition to be considered the advocate of a plaintiff, then they are considered to have certain responsibilities towards said plaintiff. First, they are responsible for organizing the plaintiff’s witnesses, including sending summons to appear before the Ruling Council. Second, they are also responsible for sending a summons to the accused to appear before the Ruling Council.
  1. Precedent requires that any recognized mage who receives such a summons comply with it, or provide a compelling reason why they cannot do so. Failure to do either may be considered a rejection of the Consilium and be punished accordingly.
  2. Precedent permits that a trial may be held regardless of the attendance of the accused, and that the refusal of the accused to attend the trial may be considered when passing judgement.
3. If a factotum is requested then it is the responsibility of the one submitting the request to send it. Precedent permits this request to be refused without explanation, but also permits any explanation submitted to be considered in the course of the trial.
4. If the trial is to be held in secret, it is at the discretion of the Ruling Council to determine who may be present for the proceedings. Precedent permits the Ruling Council to disbar any and all of those involved other than members of the Ruling Council from attending.
  1. In the event that a secret trial is to be held without the presence of any or all of the plaintiff(s), accused, witnesses, or factota; precedent permits that the Ruling Council may request any testimony or evidence they may have be submitted in advance and in such a manner as to preserve the secrecy of the actual trial.
The location in which any trial occurs is at the discretion of the Hierarch. By default all trials are to be held in the Consilium Council’s chambers at Customs House, however the Hierarch may decree that the trial be held elsewhere providing that he or she informs the Ruling Council and anyone who is required to attend.
1. Precedent holds that a failure to comply with these proceedings results in a mistrial. The consequences of this are at the discretion of the Ruling Council.
2. Precedent holds that the Hierarch may choose to hold a trial in a location that is subject to ongoing magic, such as wards, or in special locations, such as a demesne, if he or she so decrees. The same precedent permits the Hierarch to have spells cast on a location for this purpose, but any such decree must be recognized and added to Bronze Law.
The trial is to begin with the ritual swearing of all mages present to speak only the whole and unbiased truth, to pass and permit the passing of judgement fairly and in accordance with the Lex Magica, and to abide by the decisions of the Council whatever they may be. This oath is considered to fall within the bounds of Iron Law, and those found to be violating it may be subjected to judgement and punishment themselves.
Following the opening oath, the Ruling Council take up their court positions as outlined in the Consilium Charter and the trial proper begins. First the plaintiff is permitted to present their argument, either themselves or with the aid of a factotum if they have one, and then call witnesses to present testimony and be questioned by the court. Once the plaintiff rests, the accused is permitted to give their response in the same manner. This process is repeated twice, to permit each side to give counterarguments, with each giving a closing statement on their third round of argument and presentation. Following this, the court goes into recess and the Ruling Council retires into privacy to debate their judgement.
1. The discussion is held in a formal manner, with the Hierarch chairing the meeting and managing the speaking order. The Hierarch may also decide when to call for a vote, which is held in the manner of a secret ballot.
2. In the case of a normal trial a simple majority of the Councillors is required to pronounce the accused guilty or innocent. If the trial is being held in secret or was held by decree of the Hierarch rather than vote, consensus is required to declare the accused guilty but only a majority is required to pronounce innocence.
  1. Precedent requires that the nature of the vote be included when the final judgement is entered into Bronze Law.
3. In the event of a tie vote, the Councillors may choose either to continue discussion or have the Hierarch cast a tie-breaking vote. The latter requires a consensus, and if there is no consensus then discussion continues regardless. This process continues until a conclusion is reached.
  1. Precedent requires that in the event that a tie-breaking vote is called for, it must be included when the judgement is added to Bronze Law.
4. Once the Councillors have decreed guilt or innocence, the choice of punishment is made by the Hierarch. This choice is to be informed by precedent as appropriate, any and all of which must be mentioned to some extent when the judgement is added to Bronze Law. This judgement is to include not only the punishment levied, but also who carries it out and how they do so.
Once the judgement is pronounced, the trial is concluded. If more trials are to be held in the same session, the process is repeated from step 3 with a new oath being sworn by all the relevant parties. This process continues until all trials for the session are complete.

Tetragrammaton of Punishment

Minor Reprimand
Major Reprimand
Payment of Debt
Minor Penance
Major Penance
Severe Reprimand
Incarceration
Banishment
Spiritual Scourging
Spiritual Oblivion

Bronze Law

Pax Brisbanensis

It is recognized that the Second Consilium of Brisbane and the Gardens Point Assembly are at peace and have open borders. Any mage recognized by one is held to be recognized by the other, though their primary affiliation is to be declared openly to both and must be recognized by the relevant body. Any recognized mage is free to attend the public political meetings of both bodies, that is to say that any mage recognized as being affiliated with the Gardens Point Assembly is free to attend public meetings of the Consilium and any mage recognized as being affiliated with the Second Consilium of Brisbane is free to attend public meetings of the Assembly. It is recognized and supported by precedent that each body is free to define which of its meetings are considered ‘public’ and which are not, and that affiliates of the other entity are beholden to accept this judgement.

As an adjunct to this, it is recognized that each entity has its own set of laws and that diplomatic immunity is not assumed. Anyone who has not been explicitly granted diplomatic immunity is subject to the laws of the territory in which they are at any given moment. Precedent recognizes that through the use of the Mysteries it is possible to be in one territory and interact with the other. In such a case a mage may be extradited to the offended party for judgement, and if there is no call for extradition then the sovereign authority to which the mage is affiliated may still consider recognizing the actions as endangering the Pax Brisbanium and thus may levy a punishment as they see fit.

Brisbane Concord

It is recognized that Brisbane is home to more supernatural beings that just the Awakened. It is the ruling of the Council, founded in the Brisbane Concord established in 1935 with the consent of the First Consilium and re-confirmed in 1995 by the will of the Second Consilium, that a ceasefire exists with all supernatural beings that are not openly hostile towards the Consilium. This Concord does not extend to any Awakened recognized as belonging to the Seers of the Throne or recognized as a practitioner of a Left-Handed Legacy, nor does it extend protection to anyone recognized as being afflicted with the irredeemable curse of being Mad or a Banisher. It applies only to those supernatural beings who are not Awakened, who reside in Brisbane or with those who reside in Brisbane, and who do not and have never engaged in hostilities against the Consilium or those Awakened whom it recognizes.

As an adjunct to this, there is a precedent that the Brisbane Concord concedes some territories as beyond the jurisdiction of the Consilium. These territories are marked as such and any mage who goes there without diplomatic sanction does so at their own risk.

The terms of the Concord include the following. For more detail your councillor or the Hierarch, can be approached:

Edict of Identification - Where there is an imminent breach of another edict, such as abuse or violence, a mage may identify themselves through know codewords to avoid conflict. Identification in accordance with this edict is not considered a breach of concealment, or of the Precept of Secrecy.
Edict of Territory - Recognised sanctums and other consilium buildings are claimed as territory under the edict. If a mage has other properties they wish protected they may petition through their councillor to the Hierarch to have them added to the edict.
Edict of Sacred Grounds
Edict of Destruction
Edict of Abuse
Edict of Violence
Edict of Concealment - Other supernaturals have reason to also maintain secrecy, and this will be given the same consideration as the precept of secrecy. Where necessary concealment is subject to other edicts, such as identification.
Edict of Justice

Recent Judgements

The following judgements are recorded in recent Bronze Law.

Trial of Joseph, for breaking the Concord (2010)

Joseph, a Free Councillor, attacked a group of vampires in Queen Street Mall, throwing fireballs at them.
He was found guilty of the crimes of breaking the Precepts of Secrecy, of Hubris, and of breaching the Concord.
Verdict was unanimous.
Punishment was Incarceration for a stigma of forty years, carried out by Wavelength of the Assembly.

Trial of Cuffs, Dornelia and Strider (October 2013)

Dornelia cast scrying magic against the sanctum of the Archons, while Cuffs cast scrying against Gopher's pub. Strider attacked Dornelia back along the sympathic connection with Celestial Fire.
Gopher's pub was closed at the time and there was no breach of the Precept of Secrecy.
The trial was held immediately, with stricter conditions of guilt applied.
Cuffs, Dornelia and Strider were all found guilty of breaking the Precept of the Protectorate by testing the limits of a recognised sanctum and received a Minor Penance for one lunar cycle.
Strider was also found guilty under the Precept of Hubris of inflicting minor harm upon another mage and received a Major Reprimand being stripped of his recently awarded rank of Herald.
All decisions were unanimous.

Trial of Freak (November 2013)

[OOC Note Please see the Discussion page before editing the details of this trial.]

Freak was accused of revealing to those who call themselves the Lost the existence of wards and directions to the residence of a magic user, which he thought an Awakened mage.
Though Seers, Banishers, the Mad and their ilk are pointedly excluded from the Concord, this was declared irrelevant.
- This was declared due to the fact that Freak had no manner of confirming or denying whether or not the Awakened Mage fell under the Concord.
  - This decision was supported by precedent established in the Trial of Cuffs, Dornelia, and Strider.
The trial was held at the next Consilium meeting.
Freak's claim that the accusation was put out and the Trial begun knowingly in front of a Sleeper, and therefore the Heirarch was breaching Secrecy by doing so, was also declared irrelevant by the Heirarch.
- The Heirach stated this was due to the obvious subjugation of said Sleeper.
Freak was found guilty of breaking the Precept of Secrecy in revealing the existence of wards, and of threatening the Concord by inciting others against the Awakened.
As punishment, Freak was given a severe reprimand, stripped of his Liegemanship, and ejected from the Consilium.
The decision was declared by the Heirarch without consultation of the Council.
- This is in violation of the Protocols of Trial.

Forbiddance of Twerking (November 2013)

Dornelia was accused, by Councillor Cuffs, of acting inappropriately within the Consilium by engaging in the Sleeper practice of 'twerking' during a conversation with a visiting Mage.
Concillors Watchlight and Harp were in agreement, and by majority decision, the practice of twerking within Customs House was forbidden.